您现在的位置:阿里巴巴博客 > 潜龙腾渊
我的推荐
我的图片 (共4张)
我的文章

Guy Kawasaki (Garage Venture)最近design了一个The Venture Capital Aptitude Test (VCAT) http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2006/11/the_venture_cap.html

很快一个叫“This is going to be BIG!” 的blog 用 Sequoia(红杉资本)的Mike Moritz (who invested google, yahoo, paypal...)举例counterpoint Guy的test.
http://www.thisisgoingtobebig.com/2006/11/mr_moritz_guys__1.html

Both are well written and fun.

Guy 的 The Venture Capital Aptitude Test (VCAT)

If you want additional proof that we’re in a bubble, here it is: young people are trying to get into the venture capital business again. ....
Regardless, here’s my advice to all the Biffs, Sebastians, Brooks, and Tiffanys who want to be kingmakers: Venture capital is something to do at the end of your career, not the beginning. ...Furthermore, entrepreneurs should view any young person who opted for venture capital over “real world” experience with contempt it...

I’ve concocted the Venture Capital Aptitude Test (VCAT) to help people decide whether they are right for the venture capital business. ..!


VCAT见下
(From “This is going to be BIG!” blog)

Mr. Moritz... Guy's quiz says you're not cut out for the VC business
So Guy Kawasaki, who is "by no means “proven” as a venture capitalist" (by his own admission) has put together a quiz about what it takes to be a VC.

Guy thinks that , "When you’re young, you should work eighty hours a week to create a product or service that changes the world. You should not sit in board meetings listening to an entrepreneur explaining why she missed her numbers while you read email on a Blackberry and intermittently spew forth gems like, “You should partner with MySpace; I can also introduce you to a few of the losers in our portfolio.”

Furthermore, entrepreneurs should view any young person who opted for venture capital over “real world” experience with contempt."

Well, Guy, I started out on the financing side, first at an insitutional LP where I listened to a lot of VCs and then on the VC side where I listened to a lot of entreprenuers and the VCs I got to work with. It took me a while at each place before I started contributing my own two cents, and I tried to do it where I felt I had some relevent insight. Listening, in my opinion, is a skill in short demand and I feel like I learned a lot. Now I'm taking what I learned to the "real world" on the operational side, but I don't think that any of the entrepreneurs I met looked at me with contempt before I joined Oddcast. I'm glad they didn't.

Here's my advice to young people trying to get into the field. Don't let anyone tell you how to get to Mecca. There are many ways, and one thing I remembered at my time at GM was that the VCs I met came from lots of different backgrounds. Some were former entreprenuers. Others were technologists. A few came from journalism and media... others... sales.

And, to debunk Guy's quiz, I'll give the example of Mike Moritz. Moritz is a partner at Sequoia. You may know the startups he's funded: Google, Yahoo!, PayPal, eGroups, Agile... Most people consider him to be somewhat good at his job.

If Mike were to take Guy's quiz, here's what he would score:

Part I: Work Background

What is your background?

Engineering (add 5 points)
Sales (add 5 points)
Management consulting (subtract 5 points)
Investment banking (subtract 5 points)
Accounting (subtract 5 points)
MBA (subtract 5 points)
Mike would get -5 points here, because he joined Sequoia after reporting for Time Magazine and starting a newsletter and conference business. In other words, he was a media guy. Then, he made the mistake of getting an MBA.

"The ideal venture capitalist has an engineering or a sales background." Sorry, Mike.



Part II: First-Hand Experiences

You may have been in the right places, but you also need the right experiences in those places. Specifically, have you gone through these?

Been kicked in the groin by a major, long-lasting economic downturn, so that you know how powerless you are. (add 1 point)
Hmm... since Mike has been part of a successful firm for 20 years, and he invested in Google during the bubble, I'd say this is a no. His track record seems to have left his groin intact. No points.

Worked at a successful startup, so that you can speak first-hand about the ecstasy of entrepreneurship. (add 1 point)
Nope. No points.

Worked at a failed startup, so that you understand three things: first, how hard it is to achieve success; second, that the world doesn’t owe you a thing; and third, what it’s like to be fired or laid off. (add 3 points)
No failures, no points.

Worked at a public company, so that you know what the end goal looks like, warts and all. (add 1 point)
Reporter for Time. Time was public. Um.... 1 point I guess.

Held a CEO position, so that you have this fantasy experience out of your system and will not try to run the startup from a board position. (add 2 points)
Was he the CEO of the conference company he co-founded? Maybe... 2 points.

Been an angel investor with your own money, so that you understand the fiduciary responsibility of investing other people’s money. (add 2 points)
I don't think he can angel invest while working at a VC, so I'd say no. No points.

Part III: Necessary Knowledge

Finally, can you answer these questions for entrepreneurs? Because this is the kind of advice that entrepreneurs need. (Don’t worry: many current venture capitalists would fail this part.)

How do I introduce a product with no budget? (add 2 points)
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt on most of these, b/c he seems pretty smart... never met him (would like to, of course), but I'll assume. 2 points

How do I determine whether there’s really a market demand for my product? (add 1 point)
1 point. (Seems like this should get more weight, but ok..whatever...)

What do I do if customers hate our first product? (add 1 point)
1 point... [shrugs]

How do I get Walt Mossberg to return my call? (add 2 points)
This is one of those, "The way to be a successful VC is to be a successful VC before" things... I imagine Walt would answer Mike's call. 2 pts.

How do I get to the folks who run Demo? (add 1 point)
See above. 1 point.

How do I get a plug in TechCrunch? (add 1 point)
I have an issue with this one. I don't think TechCrunch has made or broken any companies (the products may have broken themselves... Arrington just calls 'em as he sees 'em). Plus, I don't really think a VC making a call to Arrington would really influence him... maybe a VC who blogs or anyone who blogs, but otherwise I really think its just create something worthwhile and submit. 0 points.

How do I get the folks at Fox Interactive to return my call? (add 1 point)
Hmm... if you're investing in a B2B company, I'm not sure how this is relevent.... but, I imagine they'd return Mike's call. A point, I guess.

How do I dominate a segment when there are five other companies doing essentially the same thing? (add 2 points)
2 Points... see Google.

How much time, energy, and money should I spend on patent protection? (add 1 point)
1 Point... a patent lawyer would know this, too.

We bet on the wrong architecture for our product; what do I do now? (add 2 points)
Since MM isn't a technical guy, but he probably has connections to lots of great CTO's, I'm going to give him 1 point here.

What kind of people should I hire: young, old, unproven, proven, cheap, expensive, local, remote? (add 1 point)
As if there was a right answer to this... whatever... 1 point.

How do I get them to leave their current jobs without throwing a lot of money at them? (add 2 points)
Benefit of the doubt... 2 points.

How do I tell my best friend that he can’t be chief technical officer just because he was a cofounder? (add 2 points)
2 points.

How do I get to the buyer at BestBuy to return my call? (add 1 point)
1 point... b/c anyone with a clue will say, "Make a product people demand at the store."

How do I handle a customer who wants to send back his purchase for a full refund? (add 1 point)
1 point.

How do I fire people? (add 2 points)
2 points.

How do I lay people off? (add 2 points)
2 points.


So, on experience, I gave him most of the points, assuming that anyone with a 20 year career in VC should know this stuff.

So, that makes his total...21.

According to the results chart:

24 points or less: Work until you can score higher and keep flying on Southwest Airlines.

 

    我做了22分,大家也做做看!

摘要:     说投资,道投资。 和大家说说几个大家都认为稳赚暴利行业的投资回报,看看如果你有这么多钱,你是否愿意去投。 今天写这个文,是因为太多人,总是喜欢幻想,说:“要是我有几百万,我要投资……”,所以就说说投资。投资不是有钱人,就可以做的,和创业比起来,虽然投资看起来舒服、简单,但是难度却比创业的要难的多...
关于独立策划人,关于我   (2007/11/17 00:31)
摘要:     独立策划人,以个人形式从事策划,虽不是现在策划行业的主流,美国管理学大师德鲁克就是以个人身份从事企业顾问工作。 策划行业在中国是个年轻的行业,作为一个智力行业,众多策划人高速成长的期待直接导致中国策划被妖魔化的结果,赵本山那个名为《策划》的小品,推波助澜的将“策划”和“忽悠”画上了等号。 策划需要独...
创业失败的8大黑洞  (2007/11/04 13:06)
摘要:    ·孤家寡人 (Single Founder) 单一创始人有什么问题呢? 最起码, 这反映了一种信心的缺乏。隐含的信息是, 创始人无法说服他的任何一个朋友跟他一起打天下。这很值得玩味: 别忘了, 他的朋友是最了解他的人。 ·固执己见 (Obstinacy) 在某些领域里, 成功的途径需要你认准了想做的事情并坚持到底, 不管遇到多...
摘要:     11号在美国生活多年的顾先生来南京和我商谈项目进行,也希望收购赢在中国第2季36强张洪泉公司的一部分股份,和我们投资公司的董事,一共四人一起吃饭喝茶聊天。 上次韩斌、窦大海来南京时候,曾经和张洪泉遇过,上次没什么时间聊,这次聊了一天,很佩服张洪泉,一个10年的计划,已经坚持了5年,现在开始逐步实现自己的梦想,在快丰收的季节。 顾丁先生是赢在中国第...
摘要:     本文是7月4日写在YAHOO博客上的,刚看了《赢在中国七宗罪》,感觉像开批斗会,能写出这样文章的人应该是很有才气的,不过批评没有什么用,解决办法呢?把这篇文章转来,抛砖引玉。 很早前就想写这篇文章,第一赛季是没有看到开头,所以一直在看,今天写海选篇。 一直认为人因为不一样而出众,因为雷同而平庸。海选通过一张问卷来筛选想来应该是项目组图省事,一下子...
摘要:         比赛阅读能力,很多人可能对这个词感觉陌生以及不理解,这个词足球评论员会经常说到:某球员有优秀的比赛阅读能力,意思是首先是在有一个能力的基础上,理解比赛情势,了解对手情况,有自己的分析、解读,并行动以达到结果。 今天提到这个词,是因为很多赢在中国第3届的1080们都在向了解改比赛的人取经、求教,赢在中国进行到第3届...
摘要:   “烤鳗鱼卷”、“北京烤鸭”还是“连锁店”?   KPCB进入风险投资行业已经有大约35年的历史了。我们最主要的投资目标是那些初创公司(Early Startups),最感兴趣的领域是信息技术(IT)和IT基础设施。一年前我们的计划之一是进军国际市场。这完全是项新的挑战。老实说,我们有90%的投资都是投向公司方圆6...
荣辱不惊,无缘赢在中国  (2007/09/26 20:05)
摘要:     也不知道怎么说了,刚到家,打开赢在中国的首页,看到1080榜单发布,仔细看了一遍,没有我的名字,又一次在3000外面了,呵呵,无奈、无语…… 最近快忙晕了,网吧28号试营业,10月1号开业,今天做图做的眼都绿了,还要忙前跑后的,不过工作总是件让我享受的事情。 1080名单也出来了,需要比赛、项目整体商业咨询企划的108...
摘要:     今天是中秋月圆之夜,适逢赢在中国第二赛季的决赛也在今晚,早上起床给我认识的3位要参加决赛的朋友发去“中秋快乐,决赛加油!”的短信,心理已经在想今晚9点半的决赛会是怎样;不禁的去想冠军是谁,名次怎样;当然也想第三届自己有没有机会…… 今晚的决战绝对会是赢在中国的最高潮、最精彩、最激烈,能在现场观战的朋...
摘要:     最近几天非常忙,网吧即将开业, 事情也越来越多,饮料公司、网游公司、点卡公司关于网吧的事情都在谈,催着装潢公司快点结束,员工要培训,店内布置,电脑、监控调试,开业宣传,开业典礼……(我还能写出几十件事情),作为连锁网吧品牌瑞得在线在江苏的旗舰店,英尚网络投资已经超过500万,一般来说我们建一家100台机器的店投资70...
摘要:    天将降大任于是人也,必先苦其心志,劳其筋骨,饿其体肤,空乏其身,行拂乱其所为,所以动心忍性,曾益其所不能。 9月25号的决赛就要开始了,关于5强座次和冠军归属的猜测和讨论也越发激烈,一直也想写关于决赛的预测,可惜一直忙,今天闲了,写写自己的想法。 我还是很看好老牟夺冠的,后面应该依次是窦大海、李书文、张华、冯志刚。 首先肯定是比赛形式很大程度上决定名次,...
晋级与否,创业依旧  (2007/09/20 23:02)
摘要:     感谢老牟在YAHOO博客里给我的留言:耐心等待吧。成与不成,创业依旧。 忙碌容易让人迷失,最近有点太忙了,台风过境让我又生病了,昏昏沉沉的,18,19号没有接到电话,有点失落,老牟一句话,点醒了我。 思想有时候需要一个归宿,回归比赛,为什么要参加比赛?我们觉得自己项目不缺钱,团队自认为完美和谐,好象找不到缺点似的,为什么参赛?我想就是要来找缺点的...
晋级OR淘汰,无声的选择  (2007/09/19 22:18)
摘要:     赢在中国3000的电话面试结束了,这2天,日子过的有些不舒坦,电话一响起,总是先紧张,然后放松下来,看号码接电话。 没接到3000的电话面试,那种又紧张又期盼的心情也到此为止了。 晋级OR淘汰?无声的选择,还是继续等待吧……
学会容忍下属的愚蠢  (2007/09/19 12:19)
摘要:    写下属的愚蠢,可能很多人又会来拍砖,可是我认为每个人都有愚蠢的时候,就算你是公司高层也会犯错误,而错误就是你的愚蠢造成的,苛刻的对自己,苛刻的对别人,那么管理就是这样,一视同仁,我向来推崇军队式管理,在越来越大的商业组织里,只有军事化的管理才可以使公司统一行动,迅速行动,有效行动! 军队里面一切下属错误被认定为愚蠢,只有“愚蠢”能触动一个...
摘要:     一个朋友问我:创业是不是很难?我回答:很难。她又问什么最难?我回答:知难不难! 创业难,守业难,知难不难。 创业不是有想法,有创意那么简单,很多80后的朋友,经常进入一个误区,就是认为有一个新想法就可以创业,于是就不停的找新想法或者推销自己的新想法。     创业是一件很系统的事情,不是一个想法这么简单。 首...
摘要: 第二季1080们,现在在做什么?有给你的108晋级做好计划吗? 最近和1080中几个不惑之年的朋友在交流的很多,发现这个赛季的选手是很有实力的,但是忙着自己的事业,没有对赢的晋级花费多大的心思,我想这样一个精英节目,不做好准备,计划好,晋级之路肯定不好走! 我是落选选手,不过我的计划是早就做好的,团队,资金和计划书都准备好了,可惜没入选……所谓尽人事,安天...
没有文化的商人在横行   (2007/09/13 13:16)
摘要:    如今,横行在大街小巷的商人们都趾高气扬,趾高气扬的很大一部分原因是因为他们没有多少文化底蕴。 如果按照世俗的眼光去看,高学历者为低学历者打工是件让人耻辱的事。但,这种现象正在当今流行起来。 在北京、上海这样的城市,拥有硕士学位、博士学位都是非常普通的。他们拥有高学历,在大大小小的公司里自由自在换着自己喜欢的职业,他们享受的是年薪而非可怜的月薪。一方面,北京、...
教你如何和VC们打交道  (2007/09/11 10:03)
摘要: 有真假风投,更有好坏风投。 本文对好项目有实质帮助,帮助好项目提高议价能力,想通过VC吃饱饭,吃好饭的朋友可以不用看; 本文可能对国内VC有些偏见,实际是对国内金融市场的一点不解,也有对国人劣根性的一些反思; 本文也有一些很VC谈判的基本原则,应该对很VC谈判的项目有些帮助; 现在国内风投和天使概念模糊,很多国内VC实际是天使。 现在国内VC跟着赢在中国开始风行,很多创业...
摘要:     第二赛季赢在中国激战正酣,新赛季又即将拉开战幕,第三赛季又开始了,你准备好了吗? 需要准备些什么? 有心的朋友,官网博客将是你参赛的最好助手,好好的经营博客是首要准备。 项目,参赛项目是参赛的基本,观看前两赛季,想来应该对VC有概念了,瞎编乱造项目是过不了关的,也不值得你拿你的信誉和时间去尝试,这样的出镜机会对你不是好事情,我想。 根据V...
无显示 无显示
博主信息
心底无私天地宽
加为好友
打个招呼
定制此作者文章
我的商铺
  • 访问量:17591
  • 文章数:26
  • 评论数:144
  • 创建日期:2007-08-12 19:51:13
RSS订阅
个人资料
最新博文
最新评论
最近访客
我的文章分类
好友列表
最近更新博客
友情链接
暂无友情链接
New Document
编辑推荐